Testimony before the House Economic Matters Committee
HB 960 and HB 205– Banning MTBE
Position: FAVORABLE
The Maryland Public Interest Research Group, MaryPIRG, is a
statewide nonprofit, nonpartisan consumer and environmental advocacy
organization with over 8,000 members across the state and a student chapter at
the
MaryPIRG strongly supports any bill that phases out and eventually bans MTBE. MaryPIRG also supports seeking an oxygenate waiver from the U.S. EPA in order to do so. MaryPIRG therefore strongly supports HB 960 and HB 205 - both of which would eliminate the use of MTBE by 2010 and 2008, respectively.
MTBE is largely unnecessary as an
oxygenate and was added to the Clean Air Act of 1990 at the behest of
the chemical industry, who also knew that the substance was likely to
contaminate groundwater. Its pollution reductions are moderate and officials in
With that in mind, we recommend
that the
Other concerns being voiced
regarding a ban on MTBE concern a possible increase in the price of gasoline.
Another concern is the state
moving forward on this without the cooperation of its neighbors. Other states
have moved forward with a ban on MTBE and those bans have not disrupted to flow
of gasoline. Worries that eliminating the oxygenate will make things difficult
for the gasoline industry are simply not true and both bills take into account
the trace amounts that may remain in the pipelines even after a ban here in
Maryland.
We encourage the ban on MTBE because
the chemical constitutes a great threat to our clean drinking water supply. In
2000, the U.S. Geological Survey estimated that up to 20 percent of the
nation’s drinking water supplies may be contaminated with MTBE. The chemical
has been found in 1,512 public drinking water systems in 28 states. Here
in
MTBE is a possible carcinogen. Long term exposure to the
chemical causes cancer in laboratory animals. In the absence of additional
data, the EPA has concluded, “MTBE poses a potential for human carcinogenicity
at high doses.”
MaryPIRG also strongly supports HB 660, requiring the owner of a gasoline underground storage tank to notify specified persons, develop a specified corrective action plan, and perform specified testing and equipment upgrades.
We also support HB 374, which requires notification of owners living within a ˝ mile radius of the spill, and HB 355, which requires those owners to pass information of the spill onto users of that water supply as well.